On 21/09/2007, Durova <nadezhda.durova(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The reason
NPOV is the most basic of principles is that without it, no
source of information can be trusted, or is worth even producing.
Fred, your well-intentioned policies will have the unintended end of
destroying our credibility.
I agree entirely. Let us not forget which road is paved with good
intentions.
Exactly how is NPOV at odds with Fred's position?
If I may quote [[WP:5]]: "Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which
means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view.
Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view;
presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any
given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point
represents; and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the
best view"."
Allowing some points of view to be censored clearly violates this.