--- BJörn Lindqvist bjourne@gmail.com wrote:
First, I'd like to state that, in general, I support Wikipedia being explicit in its illustration where necessary. I have never had a problem with potentially-offensive photos on pages like [[penis]], [[clitoris]] and the like.
You have never had a problem with from an American viewpoint potentially-offensive images? OK. I have never had a problem with potentially-offensive photos (and text!) on pages like [[female]], [[hair]], [[feet]], [[homosexual]], etc... By saying that only [[penis]] and [[clitoris]] are potentially offensive but not the other examples I mentioned, you are implying that your viewpoint is the supreme one and more important than all others.
I don't really understand what you're getting at here, but I'd like to point out that I'm British, not American.
-- Matt
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com