Phroziac wrote:
Ok, I dug farther and that happened when someone put it
up for
deletion. *SHRUG*.
Whatever went before, we've now got a revert war going on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_Township%2C_Mercer_County%2C_New_Jers…
with a bunch of people who are deleting content about the traffic circle
from the article solely because of the result of the VfD on the traffic
circle's own article.
This is _dumb._ If I were to split
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton%2C_Alberta#Sister_cities off into
its own article, which was then VfDed because it's silly to have that as
a stand-alone article, would it thenceforth and forevermore be not
allowed to put the information back into the main article on Edmonton?
This is a clear example of process being held up as more important than
content. We're trying to write an encyclopedia here, the only issue
should be whether the article on Hamilton Township is improved by
including this material. Without it the article's just another bland
Rambot extrusion. How else is it ever going to grow beyond that except
by having material added?