Phroziac wrote:
Ok, I dug farther and that happened when someone put it up for deletion. *SHRUG*.
Whatever went before, we've now got a revert war going on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_Township%2C_Mercer_County%2C_New_Jerse... with a bunch of people who are deleting content about the traffic circle from the article solely because of the result of the VfD on the traffic circle's own article.
This is _dumb._ If I were to split http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton%2C_Alberta#Sister_cities off into its own article, which was then VfDed because it's silly to have that as a stand-alone article, would it thenceforth and forevermore be not allowed to put the information back into the main article on Edmonton? This is a clear example of process being held up as more important than content. We're trying to write an encyclopedia here, the only issue should be whether the article on Hamilton Township is improved by including this material. Without it the article's just another bland Rambot extrusion. How else is it ever going to grow beyond that except by having material added?