Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) wrote:
I consider myself a rather conventional and non-rouge
type of editor and
administrator but it is requiring a supreme effort of willpower not to
perform an immediate IAR speedy deletion of this article on the ground
that
it represents an imminent threat to human life and safety whose
existence tends to place the project in disrepute. I have no desire to
create drama, but I am gravely troubled and would welcome comments from
other Wikipedians.
I hate to be a broken record, but not censored is not censored. It's not
u pto us to make a distinction on what may end up being "dangerous."
I mean, are you going to go after [[Self-immolation]]? [[Erotic
aspyxiation]]? Where do we draw the line?
-Jeff
--
If you can read this, I'm not at home.