http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/spoilers-dont-spoil-anything/
"I’ve always assumed that this reading style is a
perverse personal habit, a symptom of a flawed literary intelligence. It turns out,
though, that I was just ahead of the curve, because spoilers don’t spoil anything. In
fact, a new study [upcoming in _Psychological Science_] suggests that spoilers can
actually *increase* our enjoyment of literature. Although we’ve long assumed that the
suspense makes the story — we keep on reading because we don’t know what happens next —
this new research suggests that the tension actually detracts from our enjoyment.
The experiment itself was simple: Nicholas Christenfeld and Jonathan Leavitt of UC San
Diego gave several dozen undergraduates 12 different short stories. The stories came in
three different flavors: ironic twist stories (such as Chekhov’s “The Bet”), straight up
mysteries (“A Chess Problem” by Agatha Christie) and so-called “literary stories” by
writers like Updike and Carver. Some subjects read the story as is, without a spoiler.
Some read the story with a spoiler carefully embedded in the actual text, as if Chekhov
himself had given away the end. And some read the story with a spoiler disclaimer in the
preface.
...The first thing you probably noticed is that people don’t like literary stories. (And
that’s a shame, because Updike’s “Plumbing” is a masterpiece of prose: “All around us, we
are outlasted….”) But you might also have noticed that *almost every single story*,
regardless of genre, was more pleasurable when prefaced with a spoiler. This suggests that
I read fiction the right way, beginning with the end and working backwards. I like the
story more because the suspense is contained."
--
gwern
http://www.gwern.net