On 2/15/07, Keitei <nihthraefn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Admins must:
be neutral, above all else.
when they block
when they protect
when they delete
recuse when they are unable to be neutral
have the understanding of policy to know when it is objectively okay
to block/protect/delete
be able to judge consensus
not be a timebomb
I took a quick look in RFA and noticed that most consideration seems
to on number of mainspace edits. One candidate was opposed because
most of his edits were policy/AFD discussions and such. Excuse me but
isn't that what admins are for, "policy and such"?
I'm almost tempted to look for an IP address with thousands of edits
and nominate it for admin. It would probably get the nod.