On 2/15/07, Keitei nihthraefn@gmail.com wrote:
Admins must: be neutral, above all else. when they block when they protect when they delete recuse when they are unable to be neutral have the understanding of policy to know when it is objectively okay to block/protect/delete be able to judge consensus not be a timebomb
I took a quick look in RFA and noticed that most consideration seems to on number of mainspace edits. One candidate was opposed because most of his edits were policy/AFD discussions and such. Excuse me but isn't that what admins are for, "policy and such"?
I'm almost tempted to look for an IP address with thousands of edits and nominate it for admin. It would probably get the nod.