It is by no means a necessary conclusion that the user ought to be banned. The explanation should be interesting.
Fred
From: "Charles Matthews" charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:58:15 -0000 To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Complicity in hoaxing - how to proceed?
Fred Bauder wrote
As to proceeding, if the charge is true, please get together the material that would demonstrate that to laypeople and follow the dispute resolution procedure (although it might be accepted, with strong proof, as is, for arbitration).
The hoax is 'admitted' (i.e. the user under discussion has now on the VfD page and article talk said it is a hoax, having previously strenuously denied that with cod references to a large standard text). I am willing to collate what I know about this; but it being Christmas Eve I don't have that much time to commit to that.
Charles
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l