From: Cool Hand Luke <failure.to.communicate(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: Cool Hand Luke <failure.to.communicate(a)gmail.com>om>, English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 03:20:46 -0700 To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Complicity in hoaxing - how to proceed? That's very peculiar because ExplorerCDT encourages deleting things he sees as insignificant, to the point of encouraging "statement VfDs" (ie Jean-Luc Picard, nominated by another user at his suggestion). He's also made and many, many deletion replies in VfDs like [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Anya Schiffrin]]. Yet this anticruft crusader recently nominated [[Festivus]] for FAC. All of this is completely baffling to me. But we can't ban someone for making "bad votes", even if they _are_ misleading editors, right? On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:31:09 -0000, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

From: "Charles Matthews" <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:58:15 -0000 To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Complicity in hoaxing - how to proceed? Fred Bauder wrote The hoax is 'admitted' (i.e. the user under discussion has now on the VfD page and article talk said it is a hoax, having previously strenuously denied that with cod references to a large standard text). I am willing to collate what I know about this; but it being Christmas Eve I don't have that much time to commit to that. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l