On Dec 29, 2006, at 12:35, David Ashby wrote:
On 12/29/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:10:39 +0000, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/ Log/2006_December_28#Category:Administrators_open_to_recall.E2.80.8E
Best way forward, IMO. It's a troll's charter.
This nom's not going to change it, however. There's pretty strong "no consensus" shaping up right now.
-david
Is there any precedent (which hasn't been completely defunct) as to how to deal with such institutions as it were? Administrators open to recall isn't a category in the normal sense, and deleting the category doesn't necessarily disband the practice. I'd doubt anyone is objecting to the organization of these administrators, but instead to the practice of recalling (and all its idiosyncrasies). One can't really delete a practice, so I'd say it needs a separate more suited procedure for reforming and/or getting rid of it. However, the only similar situation that comes to my mind is the Esperanza deal, and I'd say MfD wasn't suited for that either...
--keitei