On Dec 29, 2006, at 12:35, David Ashby wrote:
On 12/29/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:10:39 +0000, "David
Gerard"
<dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/
Log/2006_December_28#Category:Administrators_open_to_recall.E2.80.8E
Best way forward, IMO. It's a troll's charter.
This nom's not going to change it, however. There's pretty strong "no
consensus" shaping up right now.
-david
Is there any precedent (which hasn't been completely defunct) as to
how to deal with such institutions as it were? Administrators open to
recall isn't a category in the normal sense, and deleting the
category doesn't necessarily disband the practice. I'd doubt anyone
is objecting to the organization of these administrators, but instead
to the practice of recalling (and all its idiosyncrasies). One can't
really delete a practice, so I'd say it needs a separate more suited
procedure for reforming and/or getting rid of it. However, the only
similar situation that comes to my mind is the Esperanza deal, and
I'd say MfD wasn't suited for that either...
--keitei