For all the folks who think they can make themselves appear more
witty than they are, just by pointing out vandalism type articles on
the site that are humourous., just stop it...
We would not want to be judged on the vandalism on wikipedia
/wikimedia projects, so making fun of the vandalism on another
site is not very cool by any standard.
For what it is worth, I checked out the articles written/created by
the sysops/admins/bureaucrats on the site, and they appeared
fairly run of the mill legitimate articles, though clearly of subjects
that would be of interests of a specific group.
There is a genuine difference between this site and the one that
was put up by stromfront. First of all, it seems this site is trying
to create selected articles, perhaps in part based on wikipedia
articles, but not mass importing the whole thing...
Most specifically of import to my own reaction to the site, they
have not mass imported all the user pages of wikipedia...
That was what got me all het up under the collar about the
previous incarnation of a nazi oriented wikiengine powered
web site...
In this particular case, they have done the look and feel
thing viz a. Viz. monobook, but their logo is in fact quite
cute.
So the best way to not be trolled (tm) by this site is to
help them as best able we are, by telling them how to
comply with GFDL, and let them either do the right thing
and show it, or fail. and show that. Please do not prejudge.
Compared to Conservapedia, I don't see them having any
specific page attacking wikipedia in any shape or form...
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]