Thanks for the images remark.
The script looks for and recognises licence types but this one did not have the public domain flag removed from it and the deletion notice was atypical.
We can catch these easily and quickly, shout if you see others. There were two out of 20000 last year.
Andrew
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.comwrote:
Someone mentioned that in a new thread as well. I agree, it doesn't look compliant. I never thought to check since it was being organised by a Wikipedia Admin... That admin reads this mailing list, so hopefully we'll get some comment soon.
That was me on Foundation-l, after Danny Wool mentioned it on his blog.
Another problem I found is that no one has apparently vetted the images. For example:
http://schools-wikipedia.org/images/103/10307.jpg.htm
From that same F-35 Lightning article, images that were actually deleted as non-free images. How are we distributing this?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/JSF_Images
We have an image in the schools encyclopedia with a big bold "this is up for deletion" notice, and that image in fact was deleted from Commons for being a copyvio violation. Back in AUGUST. So we're distributing copyright violations.
- Joe
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l