Thanks for the images remark.
The script looks for and recognises licence types but this one did not
have the public domain flag removed from it and the deletion notice
was atypical.
We can catch these easily and quickly, shout if you see others. There
were two out of 20000 last year.
Andrew
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Someone mentioned that in a new thread as well. I
agree, it doesn't
look compliant. I never thought to check since it was being organised
by a Wikipedia Admin... That admin reads this mailing list, so
hopefully we'll get some comment soon.
That was me on Foundation-l, after Danny Wool mentioned it on his blog.
Another problem I found is that no one has apparently vetted the images. For
example:
http://schools-wikipedia.org/images/103/10307.jpg.htm
From that same F-35 Lightning article, images that were actually deleted as
non-free images. How are we distributing this?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/JSF_Images
We have an image in the schools encyclopedia with a big bold "this is up for
deletion" notice, and that image in fact was deleted from Commons for being
a copyvio violation. Back in AUGUST. So we're distributing copyright
violations.
- Joe
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l