2009/9/26 stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com>om>:
The fact of the matter was then, remains so, and will
remain so, that
some articles are just not as notable, and therefore won't get seen
and won't get checked on anyone's schedule.** There is no issue of
"unforgivability' involved at all, even if we can say that there is a
serious issue of "unacceptability."
I disagree. I don't see why notability should be a factor. People
should review edits in chronological order (for sighting, anyway -
quality is different matter entirely). RC patrollers on enwiki don't
pick and choose which edits to review, and I can't see why dewiki
would be any different. Flagging revisions should just be a slightly
different (and more efficient) way of doing RC patrol.