actionforum(a)comcast.net wrote:
He is modifing statements that have been certified by
4 people, and he is basing his new accusations on my
responses to items which no longer exist in the certified
statement, this is completely bad faith vandalism. Two
of the others have given him permission on the talk page.
There is no way a procedure such as this can be fair.
I am entitled to revert vandalism, that damages wikipedia's
integrity, as this certified statement changing process does.
He can provide is changes in different response sections
if he wants. But I shouldn't have to respond to a moving
target, only to have my responses orphaned by subsequent
changes.
If anything good can come out of this, hopefully it is reform
of the system.
-- Silverback
As has been said before I do not belive that it is vandalism. If it's
their own comments then they have every right to edit them. That being
said it is defiinately questionable to modify your comments after the
fact to change their meanings in response to another user's comments.
-Jtkiefer