Slim Virgin wrote:
Risker, the situation was that a bunch of admins had
been removing
links to attack sites for about 18 months. Not in any kind of
systematic way (i.e. not hunting them down so far as I know), but just
removing them if they noticed one. That was the de facto policy.
That's how policy develops, by admins doing things. It just wasn't
written down anywhere.
I think that's generally how policy develops. But I think this policy is
fundamentally different, because it makes itself nearly invisible. How
can the rest of us fairly judge or properly adopt an unwritten policy
that we can't see the effects of?
Thanks,
William