In other words, you think it's a black operation, not just dumb. I don't. I've
seen this sort of stuff. I know it is an effective tactic, but the site viewed as a whole
does not seem to be a sophisticated "counter-intelligence" operation.
Now, of course, some day I will find out that it was, and look unsophisticated myself. A
successful operation might be deliberately be made clumsy in order to avoid detection by
genuine conservatives. Certainly the site is harmful to conservative interests.
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlotte Webb [mailto:charlottethewebb@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 10:06 AM
To: angela.anuszewski(a)gmail.com, 'English Wikipedia'
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Is Conservapedia an attack site?
On 6/1/07, Angela Anuszewski <angela.anuszewski(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If I didn't know they were actually for real,
I'd think it was a parody. :)
It looks more like an attempt to undermine the credibility of the
political right, seemingly (but not really) from within. Whereas a
parody would be written for readers' amusement, this borders more on
well-poisoning/trolling, where the desired effect is to incite
backlash by readers who assume "serious conservatives" actually share
their views, hence the name the site has chosen.
—C.W.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l