-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Turley wrote:
It works in the judicial system because of the
hierarchy of reward and
responsibilities; pay your dues, and you can work your way up to a
better job, more prestige, and more pay. But on Wikipedia, everything
is egalitarian; there are few paths "up", and going "up" doesn't
earn
you much. If you change that, so everything isn't as flat as it can
be as still run smoothly, you'll ruin the Wiki.
Yeah, this is why I think the lower-court judges would be the best way
to do this. They still get to make a decision, but it could be
reviewed and reversed later by ArbCom. The judge would more or less
act as the advocate, since there could be more of them, and they would
have fewer cases to handle individually, so they would have more time
to do what ArbCom hates doing and gets burnt out on easily.
- - Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDRG4p6MKb8lYmCtcRAjyWAJ4/ffTNGHvAoTlSKKvjC5i6IgYRHACdG+pD
0BrsTsUKIsCjZPXDNpWz394=
=5fGk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----