On 10/12/07, charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
It was a pretty bad idea to have an article on him in the first place. Less of the "cult of personality" would be welcome. But it is quite untrue that Wikipedia is a poor source of information on Brandt, as Anthony was saying.
[[Wikipedia Watch]] mentions Brandt, as it could hardly not. [[Daniel Brandt]] redirects to [[Public Information Research]]. [[Google Watch]] mentions Brandt. [[Chip Berlet]], also. [[NameBase]], too.
You're entitled to your opinion, but please note that I was mainly talking about the misinformation of Brandt in the non-article namespaces, and in the Wikipedia-related forums such as this mailing list.