On 10/12/07, charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
It was a pretty bad idea to have an article on him in
the first place. Less of the "cult of personality" would be welcome. But it is
quite untrue that Wikipedia is a poor source of information on Brandt, as Anthony was
saying.
[[Wikipedia Watch]] mentions Brandt, as it could hardly not. [[Daniel Brandt]] redirects
to [[Public Information Research]]. [[Google Watch]] mentions Brandt. [[Chip Berlet]],
also. [[NameBase]], too.
You're entitled to your opinion, but please note that I was mainly
talking about the misinformation of Brandt in the non-article
namespaces, and in the Wikipedia-related forums such as this mailing
list.