From: "Tony Sidaway"
<minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
Rubbish tends not to last long. Junk references get deleted: if not by
you, by someone else.
If only that were true.
POV warriors will always be with us.
Right. And we're talking about solutions for that.
I don't think this can be solved by
giving you and your mates encouragement to go edit warring. especially
since one of your primary justifications to this seems to be that others
cannot tell which of you is POV pushing and which of you is "warring for
truth", as it were.
Not so. Others don't want to get involved, because they have enough to do
as it is, and they aren't particularly well informed on the subject. That's
not the same thing. And please try to remember this is not about me in
particular; again, let's not make strawman arguments or personalize this.
If we armed you, we'd also be arming your
opponent.
And if he's as bad as you say he is, that would make things much worse!
Speaking purely for myself, I wish you'd *all* stop warring. It seems to
me that the 3RR is a good way of doing that, and I'm not about to let that
go.
Tony, you seem to be missing the point here. It's not about me, it's about
how to deal with a number of systemic issues on Wikipedia. And I wish you'd
stop bringing up the "let go of the 3RR" strawman argument; I'm all for the
3RR, and was one of the first people to vote in favour of it becoming an
enforcable policy. In fact, I'd like stricter enforcement.
Jay.