On 12/1/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. The *breadth* of en:wp's coverage is actually
a reason I've heard
from many who speak another language natively for preferring en:wp as
a reference - there's more likely to be something, anything, on a
given subject here than anywhere else, and a better something than
you'd get from a Google search.
Our breadth is a strength, not a weakness. We don't have to have a
30,000-byte article on something to be a useful source on it.
Are you willing to stick your neck out and say whether a two-sentence
stub on GNAA is a good thing or a bad thing?
Steve