On Sunday, November 28, 2004 5:48 PM, Phil Sandifer <sandifer(a)sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
On Nov 28, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Harry Smith wrote:
This does not appear to the be only case of POV
censoring by ArbCom
see the WP:RFAR vs Lance6Wins.
The Daniel Pipes POV is also censored.
Lance6Wins
No, your right to insert the Daniel Pipes POV is removed.
That ruling makes no attempt to affect the right of other
users to address Pipes's viewpoints. Just you.
-Snowspinner
IIRC, the wording of that was slightly unclear; it was not what seemed be
Lance6Wins's personal POV, which we noted was very similar to that Daniel
Pipes's, that was the problem, but that he was apparently unable to prevent
himself from inserting it in a non-NPOV manner in said articles.
[Snip]
Yours,
--
James D. Forrester -- Wikimedia: [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
Mail: james(a)jdforrester.org | jon(a)eh.org | csvla(a)dcs.warwick.ac.uk
IM : (MSN) jamesdforrester(a)hotmail.com