On Sunday, November 28, 2004 5:48 PM, Phil Sandifer sandifer@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On Nov 28, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Harry Smith wrote:
This does not appear to the be only case of POV censoring by ArbCom see the WP:RFAR vs Lance6Wins.
The Daniel Pipes POV is also censored.
Lance6Wins
No, your right to insert the Daniel Pipes POV is removed. That ruling makes no attempt to affect the right of other users to address Pipes's viewpoints. Just you.
-Snowspinner
IIRC, the wording of that was slightly unclear; it was not what seemed be Lance6Wins's personal POV, which we noted was very similar to that Daniel Pipes's, that was the problem, but that he was apparently unable to prevent himself from inserting it in a non-NPOV manner in said articles.
[Snip]
Yours,