On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:11:02 +0100, "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Um, no - it's because they pull shit like trashing
an RFA because the
candidate fails to support their failed policy.
The 'crats should set an example by explicitly ignoring such idiocy.
Unless of course the links were actually harassment, in which case it
doesn't matter what words we use, they still have to go.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG