On 01/04/2008, Carl Beckhorn <cbeckhorn(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:06:20PM +0100, Ian Woollard
wrote:
Even free isn't free in most cases. You
can't stick GPL in GFDL or
vice versa *unless* it's dual licensed.
That's interesting, since we accept GPL images: [[Category:GPL images]].
We would argue for a wikipedia article being a compilation work under
the GFDL. If you really want to have fun try and figure out how the
free art license is meant to mesh with the GFDL.
In the meantime actually enforcing the "The NASA website hosts a large
number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other
non-American space agencies. These are not in the public domain." part
of the warning template would be far more useful. I rather doubt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USSR_Luna_lander_bus.jpg is really
a NASA pic.
--
geni