On 01/04/2008, Carl Beckhorn cbeckhorn@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:06:20PM +0100, Ian Woollard wrote:
Even free isn't free in most cases. You can't stick GPL in GFDL or vice versa *unless* it's dual licensed.
That's interesting, since we accept GPL images: [[Category:GPL images]].
We would argue for a wikipedia article being a compilation work under the GFDL. If you really want to have fun try and figure out how the free art license is meant to mesh with the GFDL.
In the meantime actually enforcing the "The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other non-American space agencies. These are not in the public domain." part of the warning template would be far more useful. I rather doubt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USSR_Luna_lander_bus.jpg is really a NASA pic.