Having been on Wikipedia since 2006 but with most of my significant work
being described by a handful of "read, read, read, write, write, write --
edit" overhauls or creating new pages, I'm always a little self-conscious
when non-Wikipedians ask how many edits I've tallied. Hundreds! OK, probably
a thousand but surely not thousands... this is why my user page contains the
userbox:
*This user believes that a user's **edit
count<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editcountitis>
**does not necessarily reflect on the
**value*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_theory>
* of their contributions to **Wikipedia*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia>
*.*
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:58 PM, AGK <wikiagk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 September 2010 22:14, Renata St
<renatawiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's really bad for the edit
count, but that's my personal preference.
Pfft, who cares about that? Literally, I mean: these days the focus
(on enwiki at least) is on how many "featured credits" an editor has,
or variants thereof like "good article credits". Which is a far better
system IMO.
AGK
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l