Mak-4 wrote:
My answer has always been to put <ref>foo, pg. 72</ref> in the text of
the article, and the full citation in a separate section at the end. I
think it makes the wikitext much, much easier to read and edit, and is
more intuitive to newbies.
Makemi
Before my laptop crashed and consigned my work to the great bit-bucket, I
was working on augmenting the <ref> mechanism to allow something like this
to be done automagically. Maybe I ought to see about resurrecting that
sub-project... There was something about footnotes as well, whereby you
could localise a set of notes to a structure like a table: I'll see what I
can dredge up.
HTH HAND
--
Phil
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ref-tag-usage-tf3430256.html#a9620518
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.