On 9/18/06, Stephen Streater <sbstreater(a)mac.com> wrote:
There may be rights issues as well. It's not as simple
as just uploading a video, unfortunately. Some content
I have shot is only available for non-commercial use
because it was shot in Royal Parks, so this cannot be
released under a free licence so cannot be included
in Wikipedia.
Why would that be? Can a tree, a river, or a building be copyrighted?
You claim that there "may" be rights issues but you have not cited any
American law which back up your claim.
Recently, a lot of [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt]] has been spread
regarding these issues: Popular Photography magazine discussed them
recently. In reality, a building, a park, or such _cannot_ be
trademarked.
Cheers,
[[User:Unforgettableid]]