On 3/20/07, jf_wikipedia jf_wikipedia@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Slim Virgin wrote:
The merge was popular, smooth, there were no changes to policy, and ATT has quickly become a widely used page, so I'm assuming this was a misunderstanding that will be sorted out soon enough.
I am not so sure, SlimVirgin.
This is what he writes. He calls ATT a "monumentally bad idea". What needs to be clarified is that the distintions between V, RS and OR not only have been maintained in WP:ATT, but their formulation synchronized with one another as well.
Exactly, and I hope when he realizes that he'll reconsider what he did today. I do think it was based on a misunderstanding prompted by the discussion on the list about the Langan article.
Sarah