On 5/9/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/8/06, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting idea, but I would explicitly exclude
that; if we sit for a few days debating notability and then someone
drops by and point out that the subject is a hoax and doesn't actually
exist, we probably don't want too much red tape in the way of deleting
Very true, we should probably invent a shortcut procedure for hoaxes
and copyright violations. I propose we call it "speedy deletion".
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Hoaxes as such are not grounds for speedy deletion. You might want to argue
that they are vandalism but that would be contentious. If I come across
something that is dodgy and there seems to be no verifiable material for it,
I normally propose it for deletion.
Whether hoaxes should be grounds for speedy deletion is of course another
See our grounds for speedy deletion for clarification.