I mentioned recently somewhere on wiki that I thought the only
currently functioning online forum discussing Wikipedia is now
Wikipedia Review... someone in response (I think it was JzG?) -
mentioned that the mailing list is the optimal place for discussing
wiki matters - this of course tallies with the responses to this
thread to date (thanks Greg!)
Further to Jon's comment about floating ideas (and whether or not
they're welcome) - I just wanted to ask about others' ideas about
disruption / moderation and the 'editorial control' aspects of how
this list works... is the list of folk on moderation publicly
accessible? (should it be? I'd certainly be in favour.....) - is it
normal practice for folk to be 'unsubscribed' from the list if their
disruptions continue? - and is there any oversight / discussion of
when these measures are appropriate or inappropriate?
The last six months have been the most 'meta'-active of my wiki
experience, and I'm interested in discussing the above to continue to
see how this list works, and how helpful it can be.....
cheers,
PM.
ps. I'd also like to be removed from moderation?!