From: "A Nony Mouse" tempforcomments@hotmail.com
I'm sorry, I am not assuming from the silence of other users. I am assuming from their completely disrespectful, dismissive, and insulting attitude towards Enviroknot.
As opposed to your completely disrespectful, dismissive, and insulting attitude towards the admins here?
This is a user who has been wronged repeatedly.
Nonsense.
Even if a sockpuppet, his account has committed no crimes against Wikipedia.
Well, except 3RR violation. You keep forgetting that.
His user page has been repeatedly vandalized
Whose fault is that? Not the admins here.
and he has been repeatedly accused of being a sockpuppet based on where he edits.
No, based on his IP address, and his editing styie. You seem not to comprehend that.
From the very first email he sent to this list I saw nothing but list members being dismissive and rude.
It's not the first time "Cranston" has e-mailed this list.
Good Faith was NEVER assumed concerning this user. The entire list broke its own rules and refused to deal straightforwardly with a user who was being harassed and abused.
Nonsense. As I said above, it's not the first time "Cranston" has e-mailed this list.
We should be above this sort of behavior. The point of Wikipedia policy is to rehabilitate editors if at all possible, not harass newcomers into leaving.
No, the point of Wikipedia policy is to create a great encyclopedia, not to rehabilitate editors who break policy.
Jay.