From: "A Nony Mouse"
I'm sorry, I am not assuming from the silence of other users.
I am assuming from their completely disrespectful, dismissive, and
insulting attitude towards Enviroknot.
As opposed to your completely disrespectful, dismissive, and insulting
attitude towards the admins here?
This is a user who has been wronged repeatedly.
Even if a sockpuppet, his account has committed no
Well, except 3RR violation. You keep forgetting that.
His user page has been repeatedly vandalized
Whose fault is that? Not the admins here.
and he has been repeatedly accused of being a
sockpuppet based on where he
No, based on his IP address, and his editing styie. You seem not to
From the very first email he sent to this list I saw
nothing but list
members being dismissive and rude.
It's not the first time "Cranston" has e-mailed this list.
Good Faith was NEVER assumed concerning this user. The
entire list broke
its own rules and refused to deal straightforwardly with a user who was
being harassed and abused.
Nonsense. As I said above, it's not the first time "Cranston" has e-mailed
We should be above this sort of behavior. The point of
Wikipedia policy is
to rehabilitate editors if at all possible, not harass newcomers into
No, the point of Wikipedia policy is to create a great encyclopedia, not to
rehabilitate editors who break policy.