On 14/10/2007, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
I must have missed something. Are there people
seriously
advocating that [[Michael Moore]] cannot contain a link to
michaelmoore.com? If so, I'd say this proves beyond doubt that
the policy-that-can't-be-called-BADSITES really is unworkable,
that the bizarre repercussions which some have predicted are
not only realistically possible, but have already happened.
They have seriously tried to remove the link from the article as
containing a personal attack on a Wikipedia editor (which it arguably
did) and edit-warred to keep it off, yes.
- d.