On 29 May 2007 at 10:55:54 +0200, "MacGyverMagic/Mgm"
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There's no
examples of why attack sites should not be linked. Suppose
you're discussing a forum post from Wikipedia Review in some
Wikipedia-relevant discussion.
How can you reasonably do that without linking to it?
At least part of that site can be considered attack site (I have no idea if
the Brandt's Hivemind page is still gone), but there's plenty of simple
crititcs there whose posts are worth discussing. I don't see why we should
ban an entire site just for part of its content.
Brandt's Hivemind is (or was) in Wikipedia Watch, not Wikipedia
Review. Some people in this "BADSITES debate" seem to sometimes
confuse the two sites (and it's hard to show them otherwise without
committing the venal sin of linking to the sites).
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site:
http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips:
http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site:
http://domains.dan.info/