We'll be a step into the right direction if people try to improve some
articles before nominating them for deletion.
Sure, you CAN speedy an article for failing to claim notability, but if a
quick google search shows beyond a shadow of a doubt it is notable and you
can add a few words to prove it, it's really not the most produvtive
endeavor to delete something.
I see a lot of deletion discussions questioning notability when the
nominator has no real idea about the subject. Perhaps when can have a
separate page for notability discussions to avoid having them nominated
for
deletion ebefore we have all the facts.
Mgm
Glad to know someone else sees this. I can't figure out how I would know an
article should be deleted without knowing enough about the subject to
discuss it even. I'm an old school gamer--how could I possibly tell which
gaming articles should be deleted? If "nonsense to me" were a reason, they
should all be deleted, except, of course, for Pong and Tetris. But this is
the case, AfD nominator asserts it should be deleted because they never
heard of it--someone asked for examples, I've found it in a number of votes,
but I'll find it a current article and post it soon. It's common enough.
KP