Our project is constrained only by the bounds we put
on it.
We decided not to bind ourselves to "decent" images (whatever that means).
If you think this violates the sense of being an "encyclopedia" I would
suggest that is because you think this image is "indecent" (meaning
obscene) and
I have no idea why you can't just say that.
I think we disagree over whether or not including indecent images in
an encyclopedia constitutes good scholarship. (Yes, I do think the
image is obscene, but that is irrelevant.) I argue no; you seem to
argue yes; and we'll just have to agree to disagree.
—Thomas Larsen