On 8/23/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Not that I know of. I even emailed the FSF for
clarification and got
back that simplifications are oversimplifications and people really do
need to read the license.
I always found that mildly ironic. If people widely read and
understood the GFDL the FSF would lose significant credibility in
short order.
My goodness the GFDL is a crap license for a wiki ...
Pure GFDL is useful only for the GNU manifesto nothing else. For
anything else CC-BY-ND does the job better.
The modified version of the GFDL we use is just about acceptable for
books but is still pretty poor.
--
geni