On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:40 AM, brewhaha%40edmc.net brewhaha@edmc.netwrote:
a.. 2007-09-05T20:26:03 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Muhammad ? (moved Talk:Muhammad to Talk:Muhammad raped little children, and he was a known prostitute, aka male whore. He worshiped Satan and sacrificed babies in his name.)
Okay...This is about the worst I hav found, and it does not go under the heading of common assault. So, where is this stuff where Jeremy Hanson makes threats about doing things like this? Overall, he seems like a bot that likes moving things to "HAGGER????". Under verizon's acceptable use policy, if they were enforcing it, yes, he could find himself and his mother disjoined from the internet. Under the law though, it is not common assault, so that hoped-for visit from feds is not likely. Hate-crimes? I did not look there, yet. They are not big in the western world. Remember the cartoons published? So, in total, I think range blocks are the best way to go. People with IDs will still be able to edit from verizon, and in fact people can obtain IDs via-e-mail, so I think "collateral damage" is a strong term for unintentional and temporary blocks. This will let the clerks nail down all of Grawp's accounts before he creates new ones. In a world of rampant excellence, verizon's users will ask verizon why, and verizon will ask someone at wikipedia in turn. Where is the common assault?
You clearly haven't looked very far then. He's made hundreds of attacks on editors in page moves and username creations. I won't say what they are, but I assure you, they are nasty.