I asked *where*, as in a link. Even suspected sockpuppets are fine, because checkuser is
not a crystal ball, and I am not too shabby at patterns. The standard for reporting to
police is common assault. That means an explicit threat of violence against a specific
individual, organization or group. It is a lot more common in bars where you can read how
serious they are. Hence the question to Durova about "How did that make you
feel?". (It makes the written medium more difficult, and not impossible). The
transaction must be accessible to police if not me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarrukh&diff=prev&ol…
That counts as a personal attack on wikipedia. It does not count as common assault, so I
do not see any visits from the F.B.I. prompted by the R.C.M.P., for Jeremy Hanson, today.
Maybe some phone calls from vocal wikipedians...'What was the point of that comment
you made to ...., saying "...", no wonder some people want to block Verizon...
Why don't you spend time in news://alt.flame ? ... Lotsa room for a potty mouth in
there. For that matter, there is room for people who want to make serious accusations
against high and ancient religious figures. >From the latin it is "Of the dead,
only good". Following that standard, Hitler will be forgotten.
"Al Tally" <majorly.wiki(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:7c865bab0901151825h326d3189jbcd577b410c19e10@mail.gmail.com...
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:40 AM,
brewhaha%40edmc.net
<brewhaha(a)edmc.net>wrote;wrote:
a.. 2007-09-05T20:26:03 (hist) (diff) m Talk:Muhammad ? (moved
Talk:Muhammad
to Talk:Muhammad raped little children, and he was a known prostitute, aka
male whore. He worshiped Satan and sacrificed babies in his name.)
Okay...This is about the worst I hav found, and it does not go under the
heading of common assault. So, where is this stuff where Jeremy Hanson
makes
threats about doing things like this? Overall, he seems like a bot that
likes moving things to "HAGGER????". Under verizon's acceptable use
policy,
if they were enforcing it, yes, he could find himself and his mother
disjoined from the internet. Under the law though, it is not common
assault,
so that hoped-for visit from feds is not likely. Hate-crimes? I did not
look
there, yet. They are not big in the western world. Remember the cartoons
published? So, in total, I think range blocks are the best way to go.
People
with IDs will still be able to edit from verizon, and in fact people can
obtain IDs via-e-mail, so I think "collateral damage" is a strong term for
unintentional and temporary blocks. This will let the clerks nail down all
of Grawp's accounts before he creates new ones. In a world of rampant
excellence, verizon's users will ask verizon why, and verizon will ask
someone at wikipedia in turn. Where is the common assault?
You clearly haven't looked very far then. He's made hundreds of attacks on
editors in page moves and username creations. I won't say what they are, but
I assure you, they are nasty.
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l