Daniel P.B.Smith wrote:
A weak point of Wikipedia is that people write about what they are interested in, so given several topics of apparently comparable importance, the length, depth, and quality of the articles may differ widely.
This is true. This is called "Systematic bias": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Replies_to_common_objections#Systemat...
This largely escapes notice in the web edition, but will become much more apparent in a print edition.
Is that really so bad, though? I'm sure most people will understand. :)
Timwi