Daniel P.B.Smith wrote:
A weak point of Wikipedia is that people write about
what they are
interested in, so given several topics of apparently comparable
importance, the length, depth, and quality of the articles may differ
widely.
This is true. This is called "Systematic bias":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Replies_to_common_objections#Systema…
This largely escapes notice in the web edition, but
will become
much more apparent in a print edition.
Is that really so bad, though? I'm sure most people will understand. :)
Timwi