Chris Jenkinson wrote:
Actually, we were discussing this very issue on IRC
earlier. The main
problem we found with this was that it would be a new target for
vandals - to recategorise various images into unrelated categories.
Also, when going through the filter to select categories that they do
not wish to see, people might find it objectionable to have content
like beheadings or sexual activity available for people to view. I'm
assuming of course that all 'categories' of images like this would be
on by default - also, this would only be practical if it were for
registered users, of which the vast majority of visitors aren't.
Google has SafeSearch - and how many millions of people use Google?
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis