On 4/10/06, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gawab.com> wrote:
Just a sidenote, but I would have closed that as a
delete. Most of the
keep "votes" came from anons or new editors, so that combined with the
fact that none of them cited policy as a reason to keep (while the
deleters did) should have been enough to discount their votes (assuming
we are pretending WP:IS a democracy). The article as it stands right now
*really* tempts me to speedy it right away, but fortunately I've learnt
not to meddle with the community's will, which apparently choose and
picks policy as it likes (incidentally, so do admins -- so we're all
guilty here). Yeah. Just rambling here. :p
Yeah, I felt like doing that too... But then I think I've done enough
out-of-process deletion for a while.
--
Sam