On 10/6/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Ryan Delaney wrote:
Appelate courts also do not permit new evidence to be brought forth.
They judge on points of law rather than facts. It would be up to the
lower ranking tribunal to sort through the mass of irrelevant material
that is often raised.
Oh please don't let's repeat the recent VFU idiocy again, refusing to look
at what's in front of our faces because of some sterile rules. Wikipedia
isn't a court system of a legislature.
Arbcom *should* look at facts, and make a judgement that fits the
circumstances, not some abstract law.