On 10/6/05, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Ryan Delaney wrote:
Appelate courts also do not permit new evidence to be brought forth. They judge on points of law rather than facts. It would be up to the lower ranking tribunal to sort through the mass of irrelevant material that is often raised.
Oh please don't let's repeat the recent VFU idiocy again, refusing to look at what's in front of our faces because of some sterile rules. Wikipedia isn't a court system of a legislature.
Arbcom *should* look at facts, and make a judgement that fits the circumstances, not some abstract law.